Answer:
emotions are cognitive
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
- emotions are behavioral
- emotions are cognitive
- emotions are physiological
- none of these
This would be an example of the fact that emotions are cognitive. The fact that emotions are cognitive means that, regardless of their content, emotions arise from systems in the brain. This also means that the brain mechanisms that give rise to emotion are not markedly different from those that give rise to our conscious thoughts.
The assumption made by the narrator this excerpt is that all hurricane Katrina victims are having experiences similar to his.
<h3>What is Assumption?</h3>
This can be defined as the willingness to accept something as true without any form of proof.
In the excerpt, Zeitoun said that he and the victims of Hurricane Katrina suffered several storms which is why option C was chosen.
Read more about Katrina here brainly.com/question/14210522
#SPJ4
This is a tricky question, since it depends what usage of the words is meant, but the best answer is: a fact.
He is treating the topic of whether the global warming is real or not and all our evidence strongly points to the fact that it is, in fact, real.
In the common usage of the word, we are talking about a fact - the best answer is b).
However, in science, the facts are referred to as "theories" - even gravity which we all experience, is known as a "theory", so there are also good arguments for the option c).
However, as I said, in the common understanding of the word, these theories are facts - if we disprove them, we stop calling them theories, and they are only hypotheses.
The answer is <u>"institutional racism".</u>
The expression "institutional racism" depicts societal examples that force severe or generally negative conditions on identifiable gatherings based on race or ethnicity. Oppression may originate from the administration, schools or the court.
Institutional racism shouldn't be mistaken for singular prejudice, which is coordinated against one or a couple of people. It has the capability of contrarily influencing individuals on a huge scale, for example, if a school declined to acknowledge any African Americans based on color.
