Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer:
A) I mean, come on, these parents need to wise up and not be so stupid about the measles! Is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The tone in the first option would be the proper one if the conversation were taking place among friends because it uses informal expressions and words that shouldn't be used when discussing a topic such as disease. So, if the passage is formal, the others fit so A is correct.
2.H loud
7. D mixture
8.F unforgettable
10.E deprived of human dignity
3. A contradiction?
