Step-by-step explanation:
<em>I</em><em> </em><em>didn't</em><em> </em><em>understand</em><em> </em><em>a thing</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
Franco comió 8/3 de pizza.
Fabián comió 5/6 de pizza.
Queremos saber quien comió más.
Entonces básicamente queremos ver cuál número es más grande, 8/3 o 5/6,
Podemos reescribir el primero como:
8/3 = (2 + 3 + 3)/3 = 2/3 + 3/3 + 3/3 = 2/3 + 1 + 1
= 2 + 2/3
En cambio, para el número 5/6, el numerador es menor que el denominador, entonces sabemos que:
5/6 < 1
Claramente podemos ver que 8/3 > 5/6
Entonces podemos concluir que Franco comió más.
Answer:
70+5+.8+.05+.004
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.
Answer:
Pedro had 1,479 base hits and Ricky had 1,200 base hits :)
Step-by-step explanation: