Answer:
There is strong resistance to the extinction when performance has been maintained with a variable schedule of reinforcement
Explanation:
variable ratio schedule of reinforcement occurs when the response has been reinforced after several unpredictable responses. It creates a high rate of steadiness in the response in the schedule. Lottery and gambling are a good example of such type of reinforcement.
In an experiment when food is supplied to a rat after one break then after four breaks after one break, again and again, it is the variable-ratio schedules
He is a pressing him because the English man thinks he is different and not human and not worth it hope this helps
Answer:
A) have higher achievement gains in science.
Explanation:
Since the teacher allows her students to select the projects that interest them, Rod is more likely to select the project of is interest and set his own personal goal to complete and do the project.
Rod is free to make their own plans to reach the objectives of the project. This will help Rod to explore more on the project because it interests him and he will learn more on the topic and will gain more.
Thus Rod will have higher achievement gains in science.
Hence the answer is
A) have higher achievement gains in science.
Answer:
D. The answer is Fatigue, stress, language and limitations
Explanation:
An error is said to have been made if the action(s) deviate from the original intention or expectation.
The internal causes of errors related to the individual may include;
1. fatigue
2. stress
3. language limitations
4. hazardous attitudes
Answer:
a) Malthus ignored other factors like technological change.
Explanation:
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) was an English cleric and a scholar, most known for his demographics theory. He is an author of <em>An Essay on the Principle of Population</em>, where he observed that increasing production of food resulted in improved well-being of the population, but this was temporary because it led to a population growth. Larger population led to the restoration of original production per capita.
He was mainly wrong because he did not account for improvement in technology of production. Development and widespread use of technology meant that it is not needed to use the same amount of energy to produce goods. Production increased much faster than the increase of population, which resulted in a failure of his theory.