Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Jackie Robinson´s breaking the color line in professional baseball was an important step in social change but it was not sufficient to alleviate racism in baseball, would be, true.
Explanation:
The hiring of Jackie Roosevelt Robinson by the manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers, Branch Rickie, in 1947, became a major step in de-segregating a sports that up until then had had mixed up feelings about using white and black players in their teams, but whose managers were not ready to be the first to give the step. On the one hand, there were those who opposed the whole crossing the color line, because segregation ensured more money, as minor league black baseball teams spent money renting out stadiums from white-managed major league teams. But on the other, managers and coaches recognized the stamina and value of black players for their teams. Branch Rickie gave the major step, and after him came others like him, but the truth is that the real change did not come immediately, but rather, in small scaffolds, as people were not ready yet to completely de-segregate. However, it did become a major back-up for the whole Civil Rights Movement. This is why the statement is true.
Answer:
D. Everything in the world is "Made in China" Literally!
Explanation:
The watch has a designer and is intricate. He compares the world to a watch and notes that it is even more intricate. As a result, it must also have a designer, and since only God is capable of creating the universe, God must therefore be real.
<h3>What are the three basic arguments in favor of God's existence?</h3>
Natural theology is the attempt to offer arguments or proofs for the existence of God. The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments have historically been the three main points of this endeavor.
<h3>What are the key arguments for design?</h3>
The typical structure of a design argument is as follows: (1) a premise that asserts that the material universe demonstrates some empirical property F; (2) a premise (or sub-argument) that asserts (or concludes) that F is convincing evidence of intelligent design or purpose; and (3) a premise (or sub-argument) that asserts that F is an empirical property that the material universe exhibits.
To Know more about demonstrates
brainly.com/question/10452434
#SPJ13
I’m not 100 percent sure but it’s most likely answer choice A
