Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
The right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in any of the amendments to the u.s. constitution.
The supreme law of the United States of America is found in its Constitution. It replaced the country's original constitution, the Articles of Confederation. It defines the framework of the national government and originally had seven articles.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and numerous other international and regional conventions all recognize privacy as a fundamental human right. Human dignity and other fundamental principles like free speech and association are supported by privacy. the fourth amendement defends against arbitrary government searches and seizures that violate one's right to privacy. Fifth Amendment: Enables the protection of personal information by granting the privilege against self-incrimination.
To know more about right to privacy refer to: brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ang pagtingin sa isang pelikula nang kritiko at maingat na nangangahulugang upang mapagtanto ang sinehan na may higit na pag-iisip at kamalayan, at upang maiangat ang isang karanasan sa celluloid. Nangangahulugan din ito ng pagkakaroon ng isang kaalamang kaalaman tungkol sa kumplikado at siksik na 'wika ng pelikula,' ang mga kombensyon, code, simbolo, cinematic na katangian, at iba pang mga kadahilanan.
Yeah ill help! what do you need?
