Answer:
A) a 23.5% decrease in materials
B) a 64% decrease in labor costs
C) a 29.1% decrease in overhead
Explanation:
White Tiger's multifactor productivity = $300 / $148 = 2.027
if we want to increase the multifactor productivity by 12%, it will = 2.27
since we will not change the sales price, we must determine the new total cost:
$300 / cost = 2.27
cost = $300 / 2.27 = $132.16 ≈ $132, which represents a $16 decrease
A) materials ⇒ $16/$68 = 23.5%
B) labor costs ⇒ $16/$25 = 64%
C) overhead ⇒ $16/$55 = 29.1%
Answer:
Project sponsor
Explanation:
In simple words, project sponsor refers to the individual who gets to enjoy the highest authority in a project and is responsible for overall success of that project.
Generally, top managers or executives of an organisation are employed in this position. The project sponsor has to keep a continuing eye on the project and is liable to ensure that the project in the en delivers all the predetermined benefits and profits.
Generally the compensation of a project sponsor is directly tied to the success of the project.
Answer:
A. True.
Explanation:
Organizations sometimes makes a bid to take control of another company by acquiring them, through the purchase of majority of the stocks or outstanding shares in the company to be acquired. Where the above is successful, the process is known as takeover.
In a takeover, the company that is being taken over is the target company, while the company taken over the target is the acquirer. A larger company may take over the smaller company through mutual agreement .
Takeover occurs when a larger company is trying to initiate a change in the smaller company by making it more profitable. They may also find value in the smaller company hence the takeover and also to eliminate competition.
Answer:
Alejandro´s opportunity cost is 2/3 of a chart.
Roger´s opportunity cost is 1/2 of a chart.
Explanation:
The cost of opportunity represent the benefits that you misses out on when choosing one alternative over another.
In this case , we can say that Alejandro and Roger can produce 2 product. And if they produce one , they loose the possibility of producing the other.
We can Illustrate this situation with a production possibility frontiers graph and if we increase the quantity produced of one good, will decrease the other, because the limited resources.
Alejandro produce 3 three pages of the paper in the same time it takes him to create two charts. We use cross multiplication to get how many charts Alejandro produce at the same time he produce a single page
1___x
3___2 so x= 1x2/3
So , in the time he produce a single page of the essay, he could produce 2/3 of a chart. This is the cost opportunity.
Roger can write two pages of the paper in the same time he can produce a single chart. So, in the time he produce a single page of the essay he could make half of a chart.
Answer:
<em> 1. The declaration is true
</em>
This is because the government often states the technology throughout the command and control legislation which the companies should use in the manufacturing.
<em> 2. This statement is false.
</em>
This is because laws on command and control are still not effectively enforced to reduce pollution, and there are therefore numerous deficiencies.
<em> 3. This statement is false.
</em>
This is because command and control are often not versatile, since all polluters require the same technology to control pollution and the same standards. It doesn't distinguish between the companies that find it easy or expensive to meet pollution standards.