Answer:
C. Because the couple is divorced, the IRS must apportion the deficiency between Mr. and Mrs. Pitt based on their relative contribution to their 2015 taxable income.
Explanation:
Because Mr and Mrs Pitt filed for a joint tax return in 2017 and got divorced in 2018 and IRS audited their tax return and found that they both underpaid their tax, the IRS must apportion the deficiency 50-50 between both of them based on their separate returns.
Answer:
The 50.30 days are required to take its credit customers to pay for their purchases.
Explanation:
For computing the average collection period, we have to use the formula of the average collection period.
Average collection period = Average accounts receivable ÷ Credit sales × total number of days in a year
= $107,900 ÷ $783,000 × 365
= 0.13780 × 365
= 50.30 days
We assume 365 days in a year
The cost of goods sold is irrelevant. Thus, it is not considered in the computation part.
Hence, 50.30 days are required to take its credit customers to pay for their purchases.
Answer:
The answer to this question is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario displayed above Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
A Quasi contract is a contract that is created by a court order, not by an agreement made by the parties to the contract. For example, quasi contracts are created by the court when no official agreement exists between the parties, in disputes over payments for goods or services
In this case there has not been an official agreement between Kathy and the hospital, However she has to pay the bill presented to her based on Quasi contract which is created to prevent an individual to be unjustly enriched or from benefiting from the situation when he/she does not deserve to do so.
Hence the answer is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Answer:
Mandy Capital A/c Dr. $100,000
Brittney Capital A/c Cr. $100,000
Explanation:
Mandy selling $100,000 shares of assets, so we will report the transaction on the sale of stock by the amount of equity sold. Now, all parties will negotiate the price that one can sell to another for this equity valuation, which would be $85,000 in this case.
