Answer:
Explanation:
From my perspective I do not agree with it. I believe that there should be a balance in both to be the complete highest value. Concerning with creativity, we should encourage and promote people to develop their creative side. Imagination is beyond our knowledge and if people work on it, we could see amazing progress with their new projects. But if we only focus on the creative side, then people could be all over the place not knowing where they want to go or sometimes to do. Concerning with specialization, it is very important that if someone is good at some specific work, she/he should specialize in it to be the best at it. But not all work should be in a linear way. People should be able to explore other things but still focus on their job. In conclusion, I believe that the best option should be a combination of both; people should specialize at the work they are the best at and should be able to explore and promote their creativity through it.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's the answer because it's the only one that includes all of them
Answer:
D). The desired outcome will not be achieved.
Explanation:
As per the question, the most likely outcome of the given scenario <em>i.e. supervisor not being entitled with the authority to impose the new laws created for the assessment or not possessing the right to assign consequences or punishment for the ones being non-compliant with the rules would be that</em> intended goal could not be accomplished. As a result of not entitling the supervisor with these essential powers, 'the desired goal or outcome of improving the frequency and thoroughness of assessments associated with nursing would not be achieved'. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
[shall he] this is correct i am sure
Think it this way. Should humans know everything or about everything, or are there certain things humans shouldn't know about?
