Answer:
The first response
Explanation:
The first response is the only claim that makes sense. To check, let's use the process of elimination.
Second: Calling the scientists' surveys unsophisticated is irrelevant and does not prove that the original claim is correct.
Third: This option does not address the points made by the counterclaim and instead pushes the original idea. It is important to remember that it is supposed to be a response, not a new statement.
Fourth: This response gives up on the original idea and ends the debate, with the counterclaim winning.
Answer:
Reefs also serve as valuable sources of seafood and bring in tourist dollars. In Hawaii, the goods and services provided by coral reefs generate about $385 million in business each year.
Explanation:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's article "Climate change in Hawaii and U.S. tropical islands" reports how the increasing climate temperature affects the overall natural world, especially reporting on the tropical islands and Hawaii. This report argues that the increasing climate will bring not only a change in the coastal and oceanic worlds but also affect the everyday lives of the humans living around it.
The article reports how reefs provide seafood and also promotes tourism, thereby bringing lots of financial profit for the places. Providing the statistics on how much income it generated through tourism, the report claims <em>"...coral reefs generate about $385 million in business each year"</em>. So, if the reefs are destroyed, then this source of income will also be affected. This supports the idea that dying reefs will change how people live their daily lives.
Thus, the correct answer is the fourth/ last option.
Answer:
make sure it has a step by step very detailed outline that could answer why questiona and says what to do if somehing goes wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
I dont get what your asking here. Is is a true or false question??
Explanation:
