Answer:
b. It could be less than, equal to, or greater than 6%.
Explanation:
THIS ARE THE OPTIONS FOR THE QUESTION BELOW!
a. Exactly equal to 6%.
b. It could be less than, equal to, or greater than 6%.
c. Greater than 6%.
d. Exactly equal to 8%.
e. Less than 6%.
Convertible bonds can be regarded as one which can be converted to equity shares at a particular time, so in this case, Base on specific terms set the coupon rate can be equal, greater even less than 6%, talking of real world, the feature of the convertible could make the coupon rate to be probably less than 6%.
Answer:
Comparative advantage
Explanation:
This concept of economics is comparative advantage that means one country has advantage of producing same product at lower cost than other. In this question China has comparative advantage over USA,
This may be due to different reasons.
1. Population of China is greater than USA, that is why employees are willing to work on low salaries in China as compared to salaries are offered in the US.
2. China is comparatively better in manufacturing industry as of with USA.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (c) the company used more labor hours than allowed by the standards.
Explanation:
The efficiency of direct labor difference tells that how efficiently direct labor has worked. If it is not favorable, it suggest that direct labor has used more labor hours than permitted by standard.
In this example given, the question direct labor difference or variance is unfavorable 17000U, it means that, direct labor was done inefficiently and has used 1000 hrs (21000-2000)more than normal standard practice or way.
Answer:
think of a problem an everyday American citizen faces. come up with an invention to solve that.
The product value and reputation of Nike, Inc. are being compromised by Nike Shoes.
<h3>
What is the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995?</h3>
The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 amends the Trademark Act of 1946 to give the owner of a well-known mark the right to an injunction and compensation for another person's commercial use of a mark or trade name if that use starts after the mark has achieved notoriety and lessens the mark's distinctiveness.
It defines the criteria the court will use to decide whether a mark is distinctive. It restricts owners of such marks to injunctive remedies unless the person for whom the injunction is requested acted with malicious intent to exploit the owner's reputation or tarnish the mark. It offers further remedies if such intent is shown to have existed.
A person's possession of a valid registration under a specific Act or on the major register renders them completely immune from legal action taken under common or state law to protect the distinctiveness of a mark, label, or form of advertisement against them with regard to that registration.
Learn more about Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 here:
brainly.com/question/15093618
#SPJ4