Answer:
The theory of national comparative advantage
Explanation:
The theory of National comparative advantage developed by Micheal porter, emphasizes on the importance of country's factors such as domestic demand and domestic rivalry in explaining a nation's dominance in the production and export of particular products.
It focuses on key concepts such as Firm Strategy, Structure and Rivalry; Factor Conditions; Demand Conditions; and Related and Supporting Industries.
Micheal porter opined that any company’s ability to compete in the international arena is based mainly on these interrelated set of location advantages that certain industries in different nations posses.
Answer:
Deferred tax asset $174000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of deferred tax asset or liability for the year 2021 is shown below:
= Income in the year 2021 × enacted tax rate for the year 2021
= $870,000 × 20%
= $174,000
By multiplying the income for the year 2021 with the enacted tax rate for the year 2021 we can get the deferred tax asset and the same is shown above
Answer: $46,950
Explanation:
a. All sources of income should be included including illegal ones.
b. Gain = 1,000 (32 - 31)
= $1,000
c. Gain = Amount received - Amount paid apportioned per year
= 25,000 - (210,000/20)
= 25,000 - 10,500
= $14,500
d. Not included as disability benefits are not included.
e. The $300 is deductible but the $200 that went towards car payment is not.
f. Taxation principles require that the person taxed should be the person earning the income so Ken will not be charged on the $1,100
g. The relevant figure here is the tax benefit before the $610 refund.
Ken claimed $6,250 in itemized deduction but the standard deduction is $6,200. Ken gained;
= 6,250 - 6,2000
= $50
h. The $30,000 is included as Ken earned it.
Gross Income = 1,200 + 1,000 + 14,500 + 200 + 50 + 30,000
= $46,950
Answer:
E) they were not involved in setting the goals
Explanation:
I personally like management by objectives (MBO) since it is a management model that encourages employee participation in the decision making processes and goal setting processes for an organization.
When the employees feel that they have a saying in the decision making processes or goal setting processes, they are really motivated to reach those goals and give their best to prove that they were right when they proposed something. The motivation is different.
In this case, the exact opposite is happening. An order coming from some distant headquarter that was made without any type of employee participation is going to generate frustration and problems.
