Answer:
B) high trust zero-sum reward practice
Explanation:
Zero sum reward practices are generally not that successful since usually only a few are benefited while several people are left out of the benefits, or lose. If someone gains a benefit at the expense of others, it will always cause friction within the organization. That friction can lead to illegitimate political behavior, which is behavior that breaks implied rules. The regular "losers" in zero sum reward practices may be tempted to break the rules or cheat in order to obtain the benefits.
For example, if the same person is always selected as the employee of the month, his/her "losing" coworkers may start to sabotage his/her work.
Honestly you should answer this one yourself it seems like a question that contains your own answer
Answer:
The correct option is option D, that is A set of buyers sharing the common needs or characteristics that the company decides to serve.
Explanation:
The concept of target market is termed as the group of potential customers to whom a company wants to sell its products and services. This group also includes specific customers to whom a company directs its marketing efforts.
Thus
Option A is not correct as it is not the market target, it is the process of market segmentations.
Option B is not correct as it is a the market coverage strategy which targets several segments of the market.
Option C is not correct as it is a method of effective marketing.
So only option D is correct.
Answer:
65 firms will be in the industry at the new long run equilibrium
Explanation:
in the long run the P=ATC
quantity before the change is
200 = 1000-4Q
4Q = 800
Q= 200
each firm output = Q/number of firms = 200 / 50
q = 4
new quantity is
200 = 1240-4Q
4Q = 1040
Q = 260
number of firms=new Q/q
=260/4 = 65
the number of firms is 65 in the long run.
Answer:
Void
Explanation:
As long as the seller made a counter offer, this counter offer made by the seller automatically leads to the rejection of the original offer from the buyer. In this light, as long as the original contract has been rejected by the seller, it is impossible for the seller to then change his mind and make a decision to accepting the original contract because at this point, the contract is void.
