Answer:
12. 21 % ; 41.98 % and 45.80 % as below
Explanation:
Total cost for the stadium is
labor $ $16,000
leasing the parking fee $55,000
Busing to and from $60,000
Total cost $131,000
Percentage per item
1. labor = 16000/131000 x 100
=12.21 percent
2.leasing parking space= 55000/131000 x 100
=41. 98 percent
3.Parking space= 60,000/131000x100
=45.80 percent
Answer:
- Stock is overpriced/ overvalued.
- Sell if you own it.
- Don't buy if you don't.
Explanation:
Use CAPM to find the required return on the stock:
Required return = Risk free rate + beta * ( Market return - risk free rate)
= 2.5% + 1.3 * (7% - 2.5%)
= 8.35%
Price based on Constant Dividend Growth Model (CDGM):
Price = Next dividend / (Required return - growth rate)
Next dividend = 1.40 * ( 1 + 4%)
= $1.456
Price = 1.456 / (8.35% - 4%)
= $33.47
<em>Stock is selling for $35. It is overvalued. Don't buy the stock. Sell if you have the stock. </em>
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>C) When profits are zero, the firm is earning sufficient revenue to cover the opportunity cost.
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
When benefits are zero, the firm is gaining adequate income to cater for the open door expense. Misfortunes bring about exit and discharge assets to stream to business sectors where there are benefits. Minimal income and negligible expenses are equivalent; some other yield levels will bring about decreased interest.
Since quite a while ago running a focused balance, a firm is winning zero financial benefits as they won't keep on delivering because it could procure a superior return in another industry. Keep on creating because such interest relates to negative bookkeeping benefits.
Answer: D
Explanation: A capital budgeting project is usually evaluated on its own merits. That is, capital budgeting decisions are treated separately from capital structure decisions. In reality, these decisions may be highly interwoven. This interweaving is most apt to result in firms accepting some negative NPV all-equity projects because changing the capital structure adds enough positive leverage tax shield value to create a positive NPV.An optimal capital structure is the objectively best mix of debt, preferred stock, and common stock that maximizes a company’s market value while minimizing its cost of capital.
In theory, debt financing offers the lowest cost of capital due to its tax deductibility. However, too much debt increases the financial risk to shareholders and the return on equity that they require. Thus, companies have to find the optimal point at which the marginal benefit of debt equals the marginal cost. As it can be difficult to pinpoint the optimal structure, managers usually attempt to operate within a range of values. They also have to take into account the signals their financing decisions send to the market.
A company with good prospects will try to raise capital using debt rather than equity, to avoid dilution and sending any negative signals to the market. Announcements made about a company taking debt are typically seen as positive news, which is known as debt signaling. If a company raises too much capital during a given time period, the costs of debt, preferred stock, and common equity will begin to rise, and as this occurs, the marginal cost of capital will also rise.
To gauge how risky a company is, potential equity investors look at the debt/equity ratio. They also compare the amount of leverage other businesses in the same industry are using on the assumption that these companies are operating with an optimal capital structure—to see if the company is employing an unusual amount of debt within its capital structure.
