Answer:
The Giver transmits a painful memory of an elephant hunt to Jonas, during which an elephant is shot and killed for its tusks.
planation:
~Zayn
Hey bud, today was my first day at grad high (fake school name). When I first found out I would be attending here I was very nervous. I’m okay now, I met a few nice people who I sat with at lunch, they showed me around the campus too. I think I like it here
In today's society we are taught to hold up and pent up our feelings which causes such sudden bursts.
Explanation:
There are times when something someone does that is only partially annoying that pushes someone over the edge.
Sometimes this is because of all the pent up anger and feelings that are yet to be expressed and the existence of the person in the middle of the modern society makes them hard to be expressed too.
Thus, we burst out at people rather unnecessarily in some cases even.
This means that people would often lay out essentially useless anger at an innocuous thing.
Answer: All right, here goes nothing. *cracks knuckles*
To begin with, the article has a weak claim. While it does vaguely introduce their stance on the topic, it poses it as a question and not a statement. Also, this claim is written in the first person, unlike strong claims that are supposed to be written in the third person. As for the "support" section, even the very beginning strays from the original claim, instead saying why <em>they </em>should own a pet instead of why <em>everyone</em> should be allowed to own pets. For example, in the second paragraph, the author cites a story from a friend of a friend. That is not valid evidence. If it was on the news, however, and the author cited that as evidence instead, the article would be much stronger. The author also delves deeper into their own personal life instead of stating facts as they should have. The transition between paragraphs is clunky at best, with the third paragraph pretty much restating the claim instead of simply saying something like "Pets are helpful to our society." And finally, the entire purpose of that last sentence seems to be to wrap up the article in a hasty fashion, without any attention to restating the claim or the facts presented.
Hope this meets the criteria! Good luck!!
