Answer:it has high coupling
Explanation: Coupling is the property in the field of computer program that is defined as the functions ,data and codes of the program are dependent on each other and cannot be changed independently if requires. Thus,high amount of coupling is not considered as good factor due to high interdependence. Loose coupling can be still permitted.
Other options are correct because name of the class should reflect the purpose and well defined responsibilities should be present, modeling of certain component and high cohesion means keeping similar functions togather is also required. So, the only bad factor is high coupling
Was this in reference to literal audio archives? If so, I don't see any cons beside possible copyright infringement.
If you're talking about the codecs themselves, then I can do that.
<span>Pros:
</span>- Widespread acceptance. Supported in nearly all hardware devices, and continually adopted by newer ones.
- Faster decoding. Much more so than FLAC, Vorbis, etc.
- Relaxed licensing schedule.
<span>Cons:
</span><span>
</span>- Lower quality and efficiency than most modern codecs. (To be fair, never really noticed this one).
- Sometimes the maximum bitrate isn't enough.
- Pretty much void/unusable for high definition audio (higher than <span>48kHz).</span>
If you are using CSS
:
table {
border-collapse: collapse;
border: 5px solid black;
width: 100%;
}
td {
width: 50%;
height: 2em;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
}
HTML
<table>
<tbody>
<tr><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
for HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Sample table</title>
<style>
table {
border-collapse: collapse;
border: 5px solid black;
width: 100%;
}
td {
width: 50%;
height: 2em;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>
