La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no hay opciones, podemos comentar esto.
Una fuente histórica se analiza de diversas maneras. Una de ella es por medio del autor. Hay que revisar quién es el autor, cómo recolectó la información, cuáles fueron sus fuentes. Si él mismo atestiguó el acontecimiento al que se refiere.
Otra forma puede ser si él entrevistó a personas que estuvieron presentes y vieron el acontecimiento que describe.
También hay que analizar qué tipo de documentos aporta para comprobar lo que se dice. Pueden ser pergaminos, cartas, fotografías, o más recientemente, videos y audios.
Otra manera es validar lo que la fuente dice, comparándola con otras fuentes que digan algo similar para corroborar la información original.
“Como seres humanos tenemos la capacidad de comunicarnos constantemente, incluso sin pronunciar palabra alguna podemos transmitir lo que pensamos y sentimos. Esto es muy importante ya que el lenguaje corporal es un medio de comunicación y en ella se refleja la identidad de cada persona.”
My personal choice would be john Locke, i feel as Locke would tell American politicians that they are corrupt and should be overthrown. that this is not the america that the founding fathers envisioned for this country. He would say the the government controls the people and the people no longer control the government and it needs to be fixed or it will be replaced.
Answer:
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.
So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.
And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.
Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"
Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.
Hope this helps!
:D
