Hi, I assumed you are referring to the story, "The Diary of Anne Frank" by Anne Frank.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Interestingly, in the story, it is quite obvious that Anne seems to have a conservative personality, however, she also appears to be a playful and cheerful person.
Anne doesn't seem to have many friends, however, she became friends with her diary. This friendship strived so much so that she could detail interestingly the experience of her family. Her nice sense of humor also aided her in persevering through the hardships she faced despite been a young girl.
If Selma wants to evaluate what went wrong when she tried to make this recipe, she should ask the following question: Did I dissolve the sugar before adding the final three ingredients?
This is the only one of the questions which refers to the specific recipe and the steps Selma should have followed, thus, evaluating what has happened.
<u>Question 1</u> asks about what can be done to improve what has already been done, so it doesn't refer to what has happened but rather to possible future steps that could impove the result.
<u>Question 2</u> tests the recipe but it doesn't assess Selma's performance on this one.
<u>Question 3</u> is irrelevant to the procedure followed as it compares this recipe to her mother's one and not the steps recommended in this recipe to the steps that Selma followed.
What's small and black and carries a suitcase is a handle, like the handle of a suitcase.
Your answer is: A handle
Have an amazing day!
No. "Children in the dark make mistakes" does not have the same meaning as "Mistakes in the dark make children." The first implies that without sufficient light, children would make mistakes, while the second implies that if you make mistakes in the dark, you'll have children.
The opposite of this sentence: "Children in the dark make mistakes", should be "Mistakes are made when Children are in a dark area".
hope this helps
