Answer
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Answer:
B). Initially, the Burger Barn executives determined the one best way to create an ice cream confection by observing the Creamy Creations old way and compared it with the FroYo operations down the street and then came up with a hybrid version of the two.
Explanation:
The 'time and motion studies' are primarily inclined to systematically evaluate or examine the performance or efficiency of operation in order to ensure the effective performance at each stage and set up a standard period of time for each operation accordingly.
As per the question, option B most appropriately applies this concept of 'time and motion study' as Burger Barn's attempts to reach a standard goal('best way to create an ice cream confection') <u>by evaluating it through comparison('..compared it with the FroYo operations down the street') to test its efficiency and then, applying it to establish the improved or enhanced operation(came up with a hybrid version of the two).</u> Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
The answer A. Readers may become annoyed if they feel the poem does not make sense.
If a story has an unreliable narrator, you should still trust what they say, although you must take it with a grain of salt. The narrator could still be telling the truth, although if they are insane they may describe seeing a ghost when there wasn't really a ghost. An unreliable narrator does not create a fake story, only an unreliable story, where there may be holes or lies weaved into truth.
Answer:
- The court should look to the intention of the founders.
Explanation:
Originalism is associated with the legal doctrine that believes in interpreting or determining the meaning of the words, phrases, or statements mentioned in the Constitution in context of 'the intention of the founders or authors' for ratification of such a clause or law in the Constitution. The originalist philosophy says that the constitution is required to be interpreted on the basis of initial/original understanding or intent of the founders instead of interpreting it in the present context. Therefore, the court should determine the meaning of the constitutional phrase on this philosophy and 'look to the intention of the founders'.
