Answer:
Ancient Rome Society
Explanation:
Traditionally, Roman society was extremely rigid. By the first century, however, the need for capable men to run Rome's vast empire was slowly eroding the old social barriers. The social structure of ancient Rome was based on heredity, property, wealth, citizenship and freedom.
The answer to this question is <span>to employ critical thinking techniques.
Pseudo-psychology tend to not be backed by a valid research to make the theory become reliabe.
With critical thinking techniques, pseudo-psychology could be easily debunked so you wouldn't be trapped within a false mindset to judge the situation that you're currently in</span>
Answer: One significant distinction among Kush and Egypt is their areas. Kush was a domain toward the south of Egypt and was worked at the base of the mountains. They had a consistent measure of precipitation. This precipitation combined with the spillover from the mountains implied that they quite often had fruitful soil. This was an alternate story for Egypt. Egypt relied upon the yearly flooding of the Nile River so as to have great soil to plant and develop food required for endurance. This flooding was indispensable to their progress. Another contrast among Kush and Egypt is that sovereigns governed Kush, not at all like the male lords and pharaohs that controlled Egypt. They additionally fabricated burial chambers like the Egyptians did however the Kush by and large constructed burial chambers with level rooftops on them. Kush likewise had regular assets, for example, gold, ivory, and iron metal. Preservation is likewise a region where they had a few contrasts. The cycle of embalmment in Egypt was frequently held for those with abundance on the grounds that the cycle was costly and the average citizens couldn't manage the cost of it. Kush aristocrats likewise embalmed their dead however the ordinary citizens preserved their dead also.
Explanation:
For the people (and we shouldn't be thinking "them", but "us" - we all hope to be older one day!)
this means a better quality of life when old, and also potential longer life and longer health: with more social stimuli, the brains will be longer healthier
For the society:
lower costs of care (since the elder will be longer independent) and the possibility of benefiting from their experience!
