Answer:
Different parts of Earth's surface receive different amounts of sunlight. The sun's rays strike Earth's surface most directly at the equator. ... Because of the Earth's tilt the sun's rays strike the surface at a slant at the poles; they are less focused. This spreads the rays over a wide area.
It was actually “The Soviet Union and its collapse hindered development.” Hope this helps!
The ground-level ozone is a harmful air pollutant that can be a danger to one's health. It is commonly created by chemical between oxides and nitrogen. Similar to ground-level ozone, smog can also be a danger to one's health, especially to the lungs. It is a mixed smoke and fog.
I believe your question is supposed to be crimes that security camera and not determine correct? if so in my opinion security cameras would not be able to prove a crime such as theft by deception which is using your words and deceiving someone into thinking their money is going to go somewhere else when really you're putting in your pocket. another example of a crime that security cameras couldn't determine would be slander which is knowing leave making up lies and spreading rumors about somebody that negatively impacts their reputation. basically any crime that you don't have to physically do something but rather you're using your words.
In April 1994 in Rwanda (East Africa) began the genocide of Tutsi - an ethnic minority, which for centuries dominated the Rwandan majority - Hutu. During the 100 days of incredible violence, about 800 000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu were murdered. The international community, unfortunately, didn't respond to this event on time. The conflict was considered as an internal case and the Security Council of the UN didn't decide to intervene. Even though the scale and character of the conflict was well known the United States didn't want to get involved because of a painful experience from its intervention in Somalia in 1993 (the story was presented in the movie Black Hawk Down).
The UN troops arrived in Rwanda when the major fights were over. They assisted only by the burial of deaths and protected the survivors. Today we know that other countries (for example France and China) were selling arms to the Rwandan government.
What could be the response? The international community could prevent the growing hostility and animosity between Hutu and Tutsi already before the genocide. They should have introduced an embargo on arms in order to prevent the escalation of violence. When the conflict had begun, a military intervention should have taken place.
