Answer: Parasite, predator
Explanation:
Managing businesses isn't an easy task despite it might be going well. On managing business, certain agreement has to be reached such as who finances , manages, and how interests are shared, when all these are well spelled out there would be no room for the other party to feel cheated while the other feels same way too. Betty and her brother feel cheated about each other's input regarding their business because they probably didn't spell out how the business operations would be run, they'll need to sort this out so they don't see each other so again.
Answer:
$33.44
Explanation:
The computation of the intrinsic value of the share is shown below:
= Next year dividend ÷ (Required rate of return - growth rate)
where,
Next year dividend is
= $2.16 + $2.16 × 4.50%
= $2.16 + $0.0972
= $2.2572
The required rate of return is 11.25%
And, the growth rate is 4.50%
So, the intrinsic value is
= ($2.2572) ÷ (11.25% - 4.50)
= $33.44
The return on investment for this division is (B) 20%.
<h3>
What is the return on investment (ROI)?</h3>
- Return on investment (ROI) or return on costs (ROC) is a ratio of net income to investment over time (costs resulting from an investment of some resources at a point in time).
- A high ROI indicates that the benefits of the investment outweigh the costs.
- ROI is used as a performance indicator to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or to compare the efficiencies of several investments.
- It is one method of connecting profits to capital invested in economic terms.
<h3>To find the return on investment for this division:</h3>
= income/average invested assets
= $40,000/$200,000
= return on investment
= 20%
Therefore, the return on investment for this division is (B) 20%.
Know more about return on investment here:
brainly.com/question/15726451
#SPJ4
Correct question:
The Midwest Division of Grainger Company has an investment center average invested assets of $200,000 and an investment center income of $40,000. What is the return on investment for this division?
(A) 500%
(B) 20%
(C) 25%
(D) 80%
Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
Answer:
TRADE DEFICIT
FOREIGN CURRENCY RESERVE DEPLETION
LOCAL CURRENCY DEVALUATION
RECESSION
POTENTIAL UNEMPLOYMENT
Explanation:
The problem that could develop if the U.S. became too dependent on other nations for goods and services are:
1. Trade deficit because when a country imports more than it exports it runs a trade deficit.
2. Foreign Currency Reserve Depletion: If the U.S. has to import so much from other countries, it will need to increase its foreign reserve because that is how it will pay for such imports. Otherwise the foreign reserve will be hugely depleted
3. Local Currency Devaluation. Reliance on exports can devalue the worth of the local currency because the demand of the foreign currency will be high in relation to local currency and people will be willing to pay more to get foreign currency, which will devalue the local currency
4. Recession: If the United States is reliant on OPEC countries for Oil and an embargo is placed on oil export from those, the U.S. will suffer a recession.
5. Potential Unemployment: Imports of finished goods will cripple local industries who will be forced to compete with the international firms whose goods and services are being imported; and those employed in such industries might loose their jobs, if the small local enterprises are unable to survive such competition.
