<span>The admission of Alabama as a slave state was the main point of controversy that led to the Missouri Compromise. After Alabama wanted to be part of the Union by being a slave state, the number of free state to slave state became equal to 11. This angered the free states and the members of the Congress that were in favor of slavery free states. The only way to stop the coming civil war was the Missouri Compromise. If Missouri was admitted as the slave state then the balance of equality would tilt towards the slave states and this would result in a big clash. To stop this from happening, the Missouri Compromise was the middle path that was chosen. </span>
The people
they get their power from the people
Supply side economic has led to lower relative taxes on higher earning citizens in America because a group of economists, journalists, and politicians formed or became adherents of a school of thought called “supply-side economics.” Its three most prominent economists were Arthur Laffer, then at the University of Southern California; Alan Reynolds, then at First National Bank of Chicago; and Paul Craig Roberts, a prominent staff member to various Republican congressional committees and, early in the Reagan administration, the assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy.
The journalist who was most committed to supply-side thought was the late Jude Wanniski, an editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal, and Jack Kemp, a Buffalo-area Republican congressman, was the group’s best-known politician. One other early supply-sider, an historian who became a bona fide economist, was Kemp’s aide Bruce Bartlett.
Their argument was basically an application of one of the most important principles in economics: incentives affect behavior. Specifically, they focused on the harm that high marginal tax rates inflict on an economy and the growth in an economy’s real output that can occur if the highest marginal tax rates are reduced.
Answer:
putting it in, keeping it in, getting it out.
Explanation:
The UN, United Nations is an organization that unites nations, so its very purpose and all its actions are directed at this goal.
One example are the different initiatives and committees that the UN has that span across several countries, or even all or almost all of them. An example is UNESCO, the United Nations organization that protects world-wide cultural heritage. It's a bonus for tourism to have the country's attractions on UNESCO World Heritage List, and some of those sites are shared, such as Prehistoric pile dwellings around the Alps, which is shared among 6 countries.
Additionally UN works towards combating the aspect that threatens the cooperation most: conflicts and open wars. Specifically, it sends troops to affected regions and negotiates peace talks.
<span />
