Answer:
I think it's D
Explanation:
because savings are in the beginning of their financial lives,”
I hope this helped u :)
Yes, that seems like a prudent decision. Maybe provide more information?
Answer:
B. No, because the advertisements are an invitation to bid.
Explanation:
An advert is not legally binding as it is just a means to capture consumer attention and convince them to buy a product or service.
Advertisements are merely considered as invitations to bid so the one made by Neti-pot Co is misleading because anybody reading it will immediately assume if a consumer takes the product the way it is advertised and begin to get side effects, the company will really give out the $100 promised.
Therefore, Sheldon wont get any compensation even if she decides to sue.
She will have to bear the consequences alone.
