Answer: Cognitive dissonance
Explanation: this is the conflicting issue of attributes or beliefs and morals basically.
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
Progressivism was a collective of different ideas and activities, and was not a tightly organized political movement with a specific set of goals. In other words, In was a series of responses to problems in American society that had emerged from the growth of industry. Progressives often believed that industrialization and urbanization had created many social problems. Once they saw the poverty of the working class and the filth of crime of urban society, reformers started doubting the free markets ability to address those problems. Progressives belonged to both major political parties, most of them being urban, educated, middle-class Americans. Among their leaders were journalists, social workers, educators, politicians, and members of the clergy. The reason the progressives through the they could improve society was their strong faith in science and technology; the application of scientific knowledge had produced the lightbulb, the telephone, and the automobile. Thinking that science and technology had benefited people; thus, progressives believed using scientific principles could also produce solutions for society.
Hope this helps! :)
The correct answer is C) Owes her money.
A civil trial would be most likely to result if Mary says that Ann owes her money.
In legal terms, we are referring to a civil trial when there is a legal dispute in a civil matter, which means that two parties need to resolve a difference between them.
A party has to file a complaint paying a fee to start the process. In this case, it is a civil case because it is a problem between two civilians, Mary and Ann, Mary stating that Ann owes her money.
Other types of civil cases are contract disputes, property disputes, and divorces.
The other types of cases in the United States are legal Criminal cases.
It is B. Baghdad :) I hope it helps
