Answer:
Case study
Explanation:
A case study is a kind of study used in social sciences in which the researcher observes an individual/group/event in a very in-depth manner. Case studies give a lot of information about the person or group who is being studied and let the researcher make causal inferences (because of the in-depth observation) and the researcher gets a better understanding of the situation.
In this question, the psychologist faces an ethical dilemma of needing to remove a potentially beneficial treatment. However, using a case study, she wouldn't need to do so because she could observe the autistic child in his environment without changing it, because the case study is an observing explanatory study. Therefore, the ethical dilemma would be eliminated and she could draw conclusions from the study.
Answer:
By allowing multiple courts to review a case of ruling before closing it completely.
Explanation:
Apx
The correct answer here would be D.
The Kellogg-Briand Pact in an international agreement signed by 64 nations which through it renounced war and agreed not to use it to solve disputes. The disputes were to be settled peacefully. It was signed in 1928 and had little effect, mainly because the League of Nations was enable to enforce it due to lack of authority and the absence of US. So the correct answer is D.
Absolute poverty is the answer for the first blank
and Relative poverty refers to the second blank as you have it at the end of your question so you would be correct to put it that way (:
