Answer:
Occupy movement could be explained through Durkheimn's Functionalism theory and Karl Marx's Conflict theory.
Studying collective behavior it could be stated that there is a collective conscience that condemns and punishes Occupy's actions and behaviors. Due to they could be considered deviant or criminal, offending this collective conscience, Durkheim would consider the Occupy movement as a "social fact". The movement would support Durkheim's theory as a social force because it is external to the individual.
This collective conscience can evolve to organic solidarity, and in the long run, there could be anomie, while the whole society no longer supports a collective consciousness in favor of what Wall Street stands for.
This change in collective conscience could be reflected in education, due to there would not be a single and unique collective conscience taught to all the students. This organic process derived from the division of labor is also shown on a full-range diversity of interests and, therefore, of interdependent students alienated from each other with singular perspectives about the Occupy movement.
Marx would support the last phenomenon as an example of a society splitting up into hostile classes facing each other. Alienation could be referred to as several students isolated from their society and competing among themselves. Another result of alienation is false consciousness, where beliefs, ideals or ideologies are not in the person's own best interest. These beliefs, ideas or ideologies are also present in an educational proposal that may not fit the individual's interests.
Answer: This is an example of Tolerance
Explanation: When there is repeated use of drugs, the body gets familiar with the drugs and thus reduces the effects of the drug in the body. Hence, the need to increase the dosage in order to start feeling the effects again. This is exactly what is happening to Tayla in the example given above; her body system became tolerant of marijuana and she needs it in higher dosage in order to achieve the previous effect it had on her.
The Middle Colonies were where many religious people outside of white Christians came together, since it was one of the only placed that practiced freedom of religion.
Fritz is acting assertively when he responded that his feelings were hurt by what you said and i don’t think that is okay.
<h3>What is an
assertive action?</h3>
It involves the given a open and honest views, wishes and feelings about others so that both parties act appropriately.
Hence, in this case, Fritz is acting assertively when he responded.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about assertive
<em>brainly.com/question/1382911</em>
