1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalka [10]
3 years ago
14

Why did abolitionism and the prospect of the emancipation of enslaved people lead to conflict between Northern and Southern stat

es? (abolitionism, emancipation)
History
1 answer:
Alborosie3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Abolitionism and the prospect of the emancipation of enslaved people lead to conflict between Northern and Southern states because these ideas confronted citizens of the United States that were against slavery and were called abolitionists, with the people from the southern states that supported slavery.

Landlords in the southern states owned big portions of land. They needed extra hands to work on the farm fields in order to produce the number of crops needed to trade and export to Europe. That is why they had slaves that worked for long hours in the fields. Indeed, the southern states based their economy on slaves.

On the other hand, people from the North supported the emancipation of slaves and demanded the abolition of slavery in the south. Of course, the polarization of these ideas caused many conflicts and ended up being one of the main causes of the American Civil War.

You might be interested in
What steps did Wilson take to increase the government’s role in the community?
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

Woodrow Wilson's domestic policy that, promoted antitrust modification, tariff revision, and reform in banking and currency matters. Authorized Congress to enact a national income tax.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Explain one way The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen reflects Enlightenment ideals.
iVinArrow [24]
The enlightenment wanted everyone to have freedom and rights which includes the right to vote and freedom to practice religion etc. the declaration of the rights of man promised all men to have civil rights and be equal
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
4 years ago
_______________________ was an Antifederalist who felt the Constitution needed a bill of rights.
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

wow

Explanation:

thats bigg sorry but i cant help

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did President John F. Kennedy respond to the Cuban missile crisis.
koban [17]
The answer is B. because he didn't want anything In or out
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the trading policy that Secretary of State John Hay initiated with China and the European nations that alre
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the first smartphone considered a disruptive technology?
    7·2 answers
  • Three main characteristics of capitalism ​
    10·1 answer
  • The industrial revolution started in what country?
    8·1 answer
  • What was constantinoples government
    15·1 answer
  • How did Leonardo da Vinci Learn about the human body
    15·1 answer
  • How many people were killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust?
    15·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph that best explains the 1960s decade.
    7·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of segregation?
    13·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE 100 POINTS WHO ANSWERS ALL THE QUESTIONS BELOW I NEED THIS BY TOMAROW
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!