That statement is true
This argument was made by Aristotle. The common type of tragedies written in the story was happened to a heroic character. But according to him, a proper tragedies may happen for someone ordinary from everyday life
Hope this helps
Answer:
The Soviet Union. They lost over 15% of their population.
<span>Option C. It contained n udity and bl asphemy. The musical Hair had a lot of controversies but it was not because of the type of hair represented by the people in the cast, but because of the series of n ude and bl asphemous scenes that this work contained since its appearance.</span>
The correct answer is C) They were women who boycotted British goods, instead, producing the goods they needed at home.
The statement that BEST explains who the Daughters of Liberty were and the role they played in the American Revolution is "They were women who boycotted British goods, instead, producing the goods they needed at home."
All American colonists participated in the claim for liberty and independence. Men formed the Sons of Liberty. Women formed the Daughters of Liberty. This female group was formed to protest against heavy taxation from the British crown. They were angry when the English imposed the Townshend Acts of 1767, that charged taxes for imports such as lead, tea, glass, and paper. They always supported the Patriotic cause.
<span>Foremost, the Mongols produced a charismatic leader, Genghis Khan, who united the Mongol tribes in a dream of conquest and expansion.The Mongolian horse, a small and very tough infantry horse which could move very quickly and run long distances. Mongol troops were all horse-mounted and could move very quickly.The Mongol bow was a very small composite bow which could accurately shoot an arrow more than 200 yards. Combined with the fast-moving horse mounted infantry, the Mongols had a great advantage.Mongol tactics focused on speed and mobility. If a city quickly surrendered, they were lenient, but if it resisted, they were ruthless.<span>When necessary, the Mongols were willing to co-opt needed talent. For instance, when they needed to lay siege to a city, they would rely on Chinese siege engineers to lay siege to Baghdad. Compared to the empires they conquered, they weren't racist in how they used people.</span></span>
