Answer:
bu kin jhu
Explanation:
John jvghh bugs HHH jhu UV juggle
Answer: Social construct
Explanation:
The organizational effectiveness is the social construct that it is basically defined by the individual and groups instead of existing in external world independently.
Social construct basically influence the organization for their actual rights and actions. Basically, it is the idea which are accepted and created by the society people.
In the social construct all the people unite together rather than exist independently. It basically assign notion and meaning that are assign to each object in the environment.
Answer:
Debit bad debt with $4,000, and credit Accounts receivable also with $4,000.
Explanation:
New bad written off = Accounts receivable × 4% = $100,000 × 4% = $4,000
The journal entries will be as follows:
<u>Details Dr ($) Cr ($) </u>
Bad debt 4,000
Accounts receivable 4,000
<u><em>Being a bad written off the accounts receivable </em></u>
Answer:
Please find the detailed explanation below.
Situation 1 and 2 have disclosure while situation 3 does not require any disclosure.
Explanation:
Situation 1. Accrual. The one-year warranty has created what is known as contingent liability. Contingent liability is a type of liability that is dependent on the outcome of some specific actions which has happened in the past. The eventual liability may or may not happen. But since the probable claim from the one-year warranty has been determined, it should be disclosed. But if the claim cannot be determined, it shouldn't be disclosed.
Situation 2. Since this contract happened before the issuance of financial statement and the amount of loss from this contract can be reasonably estimated or determined, then it must be disclosed and the likely amount must also be disclosed. This disclosure will be under 'note to the financial statement'.
Situation 3. This is a self insurance and self insurance is not an insurance. There is no contingent liability in this situation. Also, there is no accident, no injury. Hence, this is no disclosure here.
Answer:
<h2>The United States has the comparative advantage in car production.</h2>
Explanation:
- Japan has a lower opportunity cost of producing televisions compared to cars, implying that Japan basically has to give up or sacrifice or trade off relatively less number of cars to produce one more television compared to the production of one more car.
- Alternatively, US has a lower opportunity cost of producing cars relative to televisions meaning that US has to give up, sacrifice or trade off less number of televisions to manufacture one more car in comparison to the production of one more television.
- Hence, in this case,US has a comparative advantage in the production of cars and Japan has a comparative advantage in production of television and both countries can produce these respective commodities by using relatively less productive resources or factor inputs.
