The Webster–Hayne debate<span> was a famous debate in the </span>United States<span> between </span>Senator Daniel Webster<span> of </span>Massachusetts<span> and Senator </span>Robert Y. Hayne<span> of </span>South Carolina<span> that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of </span>protectionist tariffs<span>.</span>
<span>based on what he is willing to risk, his best business option would be: Partnership or limited liability company
With partnership, he will be able to bring in a partner that understand business to cover for him and with LLC, he wouldnt held responsible for any potential loss from the business. </span>
Answer: soybean, maize, sugarcane, and rice
:)
Answer:
The world is a common house for all because, fish live in the world and therefore it is their house, plants live in the world and therefore the world is a house for plants as well, humans live in the world and therefore it is our house as well. Even objects like a pair of scissors are in the world. All things live in the world therefore, the world is a common house for all.
Explanation:
If all things can and do live in the world then the world is a common house for all.
Answer: The social cognitive theory
Explanation: The social cognitive theory suggests that learning social norms and patterns is, in fact, an observation of others. This means that in the social milieu, certain models are observed, which are assumed to be for certain genders, classes, and on the basis of those models certain behaviour is learned. The focus of learning, then, is on observing others. In this way, those observing can gain new insights and behaviours based on these insights. This model-based learning of behaviour is nothing more than imitation, which, through constant repetition, becomes an established practice, as an interaction between personal factors and the environment.
