The annual premium that would result in Stephanie's annual out-of-pocket expense that is about the same as her current plan is <em>b. $0. 28 per $100 of value.</em>
Data and Calculations:
Home value = $355,000
Annual premium rate = $0.42 per $100
Deductible $500
Total annual out-of-pocket expense = $1,991 ($355,000 x 0.0042 + $500)
New deductible = $1,000
New annual premium rate = $0.28
Total annual out-pocket expense based on the new premium rate = $1,994 ($355,000 x 0.0028 + $1,000)
Thus, the annual premium that would result in Stephanie's annual out-of-pocket expense that is about the same as her current plan is <em>Option b.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/18618915
Answer:
B) coercive power.
Explanation:
There are two ways of influencing others to follow the instruction or to get the process in the right order.Those two ways are: Reward power and coercive power.
Coercive power: It is the ability of the authority to use power or force against people or subordinates to follow the instruction or to get them disciplined. It is an act of punishment for committing errors so that it does not get repeated.
In the given case, the manufacturer decided to punish resellers for their action. As Manufacturing decided to slow down deliveries and postpone product availability to these resellers.
Answer:
Q = 450
P = 35
Explanation:
TR = P x Q = (75 - 0.1Q) x Q = -0.1Q2 + 75Q
Then, Cost = (30Q + 1,000)
Profit: Total revenue - C
-0.1q2 + 75Q - 30q - 1,000 = -0.1q2 + 45q - 1,000
as this is a quadratic function we identify a b c:
a= -0.1 b = 45 x = -1000
the profit maximum point is at the vertex:
-b/2a = -45/ 2(-0.1) = -45/-0.1 = 450
The profit maximize at Q = 450
P = 75 - 0.1x450 = 35
Answer: The matching principle
Explanation: Matching principle is a combination of accrual accounting and revenue recognition. It states that the expenses of a company must be recorded at the same accounting period in which they were incurred to earn such revenues.
In the given case, Apple is reporting the warranty expenses at the same time period in which the revenue from such expenses is recognized.
Hence we can conclude that the given case illustrates the matching principle.
