Egyptians gained wealth and land through heredity. They inherit the wealth and land that the previous generation accumulated and use the wealth and land to acquire some more. That would be another way, buying. More or less, it is not just the lands and wealth that are bought but the people that owned these. They are bought out for their service, buying their freedom to serve a more powerful being. Thus, acquiring their wealth and land and adding it unto their own. Another one is through conquering. There are small groups at places that are rich in wealth and land. When a man in power finds this, it is easily conquered and the wealth and land would also be acquired adding it to their own. Another one would be through discovery. Wealth or land with no ownership would result to a first-come-first-serve basis. When the first man owns it, it is up to him how to defend it from people who want the same thing. In the society, the royalty or the Pharaoh would be the wealthiest and the one with the most lands through the ways mentioned above.
<u>The optimality condition in the consumer's choice between two goods is the following</u>
<u></u>
The ratio of the marginal utilities is called the Marginal Rate of Substitution between goods x and y, and it arises from the preferences of the consumer towards the two goods. The MRS establishes the rate at which this consumer can give up a certain quantity of good x in exchange for another amount good y, while maintaining the same level of utility (it establishes the units of good x that would satisfy the consumer if he had to reject a certain number of units of y, given his personal preferences).
When MRS is equaled to the price ratio, it allows to calculate the bundle of goods x and y, that provides the maximum utility to this consumer given the market prices of x and y, which means that t<u>he solution provides the highest-utility bundle that he can afford. </u>
<u>If the rule does not hold, the choice might be either suboptimal or impossible.</u> When the result is suboptimal, the consumer acquires a bundle that he can afford but that is not the one yielding the maximum utility. If the result obtained is impossible, the consumer cannot afford the bundle, even tough it yields very high utility to him.
I believe the answer is: True
When we do something foolish and risky, we would put ourselves in a situation where we have to quickly adapt to new things if we want to survive.
Even though sometimes this ended up in failure, it also give us a lot of experiences that would help us in our future decision making.
Via propaganda. They created movies which showed pro war themes... So people were encouraged to go out to fight or be anti German etc by following their examples.
Answer:
It will be almost impossible to imprison anyone he has accused.
Explanation:
i took the test