Answer:
Explanation :Article 4: People can travel freely from state to state; however, criminals who left the state where they committed the crime would be sent back for trial. Hope this helps!
B. Public railroads for people who had carriages.
Answer: The answer is the 1st option.
Explanation: The first sentence in the passage above talks about predicting the possibility of Mongolian domination and then the rest of that paragraph backs this prediction by outlining how weak or fragmented much of the world was. So the author was suggesting that the world seemed to be ripe for conquest.
The second paragraph makes reference to ignoring the latent forces of the Arabian Desert" because Arabia would have seemed what it had been for times immemorial, the refuge of small and bickering nomadic tribes. This reinforces the idea that no one would have predicted a new, powerful empire to emerge from Arabia at that time.
Answer:
A phrase that explains why.
Explanation:
A phrase that explains why would be very helpful because the claim that you have is really just stating your opinion so you need to have at least 3 facts to support your opinion.
- You already have a phrase that states you opinion.
- The sentence that repeats the claim would come at the end of the essay.
And a sentence that argues against the claim would only be useful if you we disagreeing with the claim and trying to prove that Ramses II was <u>NOT </u> the most influential Pharaoh.
