Answer: The explanation is provided below
Explanation:
Below article is the summary of the acceleration of inflation in the emerging markets that was published in 2018.
According to the article, inflation in an economy is caused by an adverse supply shock or as a result of the expansionary fiscal policy or the expansionary monetary policy.
In an adverse supply shock, total quantity of basic goods will reduce drastically causing the aggregate demand to rise exponentially and therefore, push prices higher and then gradually lead to inflation.
Also, the continous and eventual implementation of the expansionary fiscal or monetary policy through continous tax cuts or by increasing government spending or reducting interest rates, lead into significant increase in the aggregate demand and as a result, prices rise eventually resulting in hyperinflation in the economy. This will also lead to increase in the real GDP of the economy. 
Different tools in the monetary policy framework can be used to control inflation such as government securities, 
the cash reserve ratio, interest rates. To reduce recession, government utilize automatic stabilizer in order to boost the economy.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
As we know that
According to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return) 
And, the market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return is also known as the market risk premium
As we can see that the Alcoa contains high beta as compared to Hormel Foods so the Alcoa has a higher equity cost of capital
And, the higher rate is 
= (Excess return of the market) × (Alcoa beta - Hormel foods beta)
= (3%) × (1.85 - 0.39)
= 3% × 1.46
= 4.38%
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Failure to timely pay personal income taxes.
Explanation:
Rules of Conduct
This is simply said to be a full stated guidance to aim to help an auditor in applying broad principles contained in AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct
These Disreputable conduct if commited by an attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practitioner, it can therefore lead to them being disbarred or suspended from practice before the Bureau. 
Rules sometimes do changes over time due to the fact that members of profession encountered specific ethical dilemmas in complying with the principles of the code
There are 6 Principles of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. They cover:
1. Responsibilities
2. The Public Interest
3. Integrity
4. Objectivity
5. Due Care
6. Scope and Nature of Services
The disreputable conduct for which a CPA can be disbarred or suspended includes the following;
1. When they Directly or indirectly attempting to influence the official action of any employee of the Internal Revenue Service by use of threats or false accusations or by bestowing any gift, favor, or thing of value. 
2. Knowingly aiding and abetting another person to practice before the Internal Revenue Service during a period of suspension or disbarment. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
A. shareholders
Explanation:
i took the quiz sorry i did not do it sooner
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
$300,000
Explanation:
A company is implored to pay punitive damages if it only intentionally discriminated against employees or their federally protected rights. 
The punitive charges paid under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 is $50,000 per violation, this covers an employee number of 14 - 100. While companies with over 500 employees are expected to pay $300,000 per violation. 
Since Cellant Solar Energy, Inc. is involved in a case of intentional employee discrimination and it has 800 permanent employees working in different departments. The maximum punitive damage that they will have to pay under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 is $300,000.