It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, so I had to look for it, so here is the answer. <span>Consumer’s expectations of doing new things with varied kinds of information in ways that create value have resulted in the emergence of ON-DEMAND MARKETING. Hope this helps.</span>
Does this go along with an article?
Answer:
e. $111,000
Explanation:
Absorption costing income for year 3 = Income under variable costing - {Beginning inventory (units) * Fixed manufacturing overhead per unit} + {Ending inventory (units) * Fixed manufacturing overhead per unit}
Absorption costing income for year 3 = 115,000 - (500*8) + (0*8)
= 115,000 - 4,000 + 0
= $111,000
Answer:
Option E. Ensure that performance standards are not vague.
Explanation:
Option E is correct because if the performance standards are not vague and are realistic then the evaluation will be more fair. It will also not demotivate the employees as they will be accepting what went wrong.
Option A is incorrect because we can use both subjective and objective performance indicators.
Option B is incorrect because ensuring less time to appraise the performance means that the appraiser hasn't acknowledged the full scenario hence the evaluation wasn't fair.
Option C is incorrect because distributive justice must be applied. As it helps in acknowleging what the organization has done wrong with the employees that has resulted in poor performance.
Option D is incorrect because if the performance indicators are not representative of tasks for which the person was accountable then the evaluation is not fair. I will be held accountable for things which I wasn't deligated responsibility. Hence employee must be accountable for the responsibility deligated.
This was 4 years ago - 32 Michele - 35 Shelly
Now - Michele is 36, Shelly is 39