1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kay [80]
3 years ago
5

Four causes of the great depression included:

History
2 answers:
Flura [38]3 years ago
6 0
Stock market crash, bank failures, overproduction and drought
sammy [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Four major causes of the Great Depression were the stock market crash in 1929, bank failures, over-production and drought.

Explanation:

Four major causes of the Great Depression were the stock market crash in 1929, bank failures, over-production and drought.

You might be interested in
Identify the person who political ideas best supported the main ideas in the bill of rights
miv72 [106K]
Heisidockck gesksksn math
4 0
3 years ago
How did white supremacists provide support for the ku klux klan
aleksklad [387]
By joining it and participating in cross burnings hangings ect....
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these are ways that identity theft can happen? check all that apply. by forgery by phishing by fraud by financial engin
Harlamova29_29 [7]

The ways that identity theft can happen include the following:

  • by forgery,
  • by phishing, and
  • by fraud.

<h3>What is identity theft?</h3>

Identity theft occurs when an individual obtains personal information about another person and uses it for criminal purposes.

The ways that identity theft can happen include the following:

  • By forgery: this is false information about someone.

  • By phishing: when a disguised information is used to retrieve a sensitive information about someone, and

  • By fraud.

Learn more about identity here:

brainly.com/question/26045269

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why is it inaccurate to view the causes of the french revolution as a struggle between the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy? what
erica [24]
While it is important to note that the French Revolution highlighted the friction between the French bourgeoisie royalty and the aristocracy, it is not to be credited as the major cause of the revolution. The revolution was caused by the financial strain of the French government at the time. The decreasing credibility of the monarchy in terms of their management of finances and wealth induced the increasing doubt the public had for them.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide
    10·2 answers
  • Which descriptions of the Maya's civilization are true?
    13·2 answers
  • Si fueras Emperador o Emperadora de un Imperio cuáles serian tus leyes (escribe un mínimo de 4 leyes)
    5·2 answers
  • The 1980s MOST displayed which economic trend?
    13·2 answers
  • The 24th Amendment, ratified in 1964. eliminated the use of poll taxes in federal elections. Poll taxes had been used to prevent
    11·1 answer
  • The point of view expressed in this quote contributed to--
    9·2 answers
  • In which of the resources listed was the Confederacy closest to the union.
    14·1 answer
  • How have American political parties evolved since their
    7·1 answer
  • Give us some reasons that led the Southern states to secede from the Union.​
    5·1 answer
  • Bella this for u!!!!!
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!