3/8 + 1/6 is 13/24. 24/24 -13/24 is 11/24.Moe ate 11/24.
<h3>Given</h3>
x + 2 ≥ 6
<h3>Find</h3>
the graph for the solution
<h3>Solution</h3>
We can solve for x by subtacting 2 from both sides of the inequality.
... x + 2 -2 ≥ 6 -2
... x ≥ 4 . . . . . . . . . . simplify
The answer is read, "x is greater than or equal to 4." This means the solution is those real numbers that are to the right of 4 on the number line, and including 4 on the number line. Numbers to the left of 4 are <em>not included</em>. The inclusion of the number 4 is shown by putting a solid dot there (not an open circle).
The appropriate choice is the 3rd one.
Answer:
and ![H_{a}: \mu > 185](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_%7Ba%7D%3A%20%5Cmu%20%3E%20185)
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis
states that a population parameter (such as the mean, the standard deviation, and so on) is equal to a hypothesized value. We can write the null hypothesis in the form ![H_{0}: parameter = value](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_%7B0%7D%3A%20parameter%20%3D%20value)
In this context, the investigator's null hypothesis should be that the average total weight is no different than the reported value by the FAA. We can write it in this form
.
The alternative hypothesis
states that a population parameter is smaller, greater, or different than the hypothesized value in the null hypothesis. We can write the alternative hypothesis in one of three forms
![H_{a}: parameter > value\\H_{a}: parameter < value\\H_{a}: parameter \neq value](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_%7Ba%7D%3A%20parameter%20%3E%20value%5C%5CH_%7Ba%7D%3A%20parameter%20%3C%20value%5C%5CH_%7Ba%7D%3A%20parameter%20%5Cneq%20value)
The investigator wants to know if the average weight of passengers flying on small planes exceeds the FAA guideline of the average total weight of 185 pounds. He should use
as his alternative hypothesis.
Answer:
A=13825
Step-by-step explanation: