When completing the proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent, Michael completed the proof wrongly.
<h3>What are corresponding angles?</h3>
It should be noted that corresponding angles are the angles that occupy the same relative position at each intersection.
From the information, when completing the proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent, Michael completed the proof wrongly because the second statement shows that they're not Al vertically angles.
Learn more about congruent on:
brainly.com/question/2938476
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi. You need to answer the questions that people have. Just like I'm answering yours, I get some points. This way you get help on your homework and you can help others.
220-35=185
185÷2=92.5
=92.50 For each friend
Both are functions. Try not to get tripped up on notation of functions. They are they same, just written differently.
f(x) = 3x-10 is the same as 0=3x-10
2x+7y=28 is the same as 2x+7y-28=0
Just one will give you a line and the other will give you a circle. If you are ever unsure, plug them into a graphing calculator and see what you get back.
So, initially 240
-212
were empty:
this is :
12/4 is 4 so that's why i substituted it with 4.
now, later 27 1/3 were used so we add this tho the original empty space
=
=
which is the result!