The answer to this question would be: 1 5/6
To change a decimal number into fraction, you need to divide the number on the right of decimal point with 1. In this case, the number is 0.83.
This number is hard since .83 doesn't have many factors. To find the answer you can try to multiply the decimal with some number until it close to 1(no decimal left)
0.83* 2= 1.66
0.83* 3= 2.49 ---> close to half, if you find this number, you can try to double it
0.83* 4= 3.32
0.83* 5= 4.15
0.83* 6= 4.98---> close to 1, that means there is high probability that the number can be divided by 6
0.83 would be 4.98/6, but if we assume that the number is 0.8333...... then 0.83 would be 5/6. So, 1.83 would be 1 5/6
Answer:
An algebraic expression for <em>Sum of a and 5 divided by 8</em> is 
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to express the given statement as an algebraic expression.
Sum of a and 5 divided by 8
Basically, we are given the expression in English sentence and we have to write algebraic expression.
It can be done in two steps:
Sum of a and 5 = We know that sum is denoted by + sign. So, we get (a+5)
Sum of a and 5 divided by 8 = 
So, An algebraic expression for <em>Sum of a and 5 divided by 8</em> is
The first false statement in the proof as it stands is in Line 5, where it is claimed that a line of length 2.83 is congruent to a line of length 4.47. This mistake cannot be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
_____
The first erroneous tactical move is in Line 4, where the length of DE is computed, rather than the length of FD. This mistake can be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
A correct SAS proof would use segment FD in Line 4, so it could be argued that the first mistake is there.
