Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
3t+1> 3t + 2
Subtract 3t from each side
1>2
This is never true so there is no solution
Since the variable terms are the same, we only have to look at the constants
Answer:
The baker ended up with 22 extra donuts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the baker had 24 boxes and made 526 donuts, to split them evenly between the total number of boxes means that we need to divide the number of total donuts by the number of boxes:
526 ÷ 24 = 21 remainder of 22
Since 24 x 21 = 504 and 24 x 22 = 528 and the baker only made 526 donuts, then the most amount of donuts he can use to split them evenly with the total amount of 526 is 504. 526 - 504 = 22, so he has an extra 22 donuts that will not be in boxes.
If the roots to such a polynomial are 2 and

, then we can write it as

courtesy of the fundamental theorem of algebra. Now expanding yields

which would be the correct answer, but clearly this option is not listed. Which is silly, because none of the offered solutions are *the* polynomial of lowest degree and leading coefficient 1.
So this makes me think you're expected to increase the multiplicity of one of the given roots, or you're expected to pull another root out of thin air. Judging by the choices, I think it's the latter, and that you're somehow supposed to know to use

as a root. In this case, that would make our polynomial

so that the answer is (probably) the third choice.
Whoever originally wrote this question should reevaluate their word choice...
Answer:
A. the rational number system is closed under addition, but not multiplication
Step-by-step explanation:
may i pleaseee have brainliest
Answer:
Step-by-step explBanation: