I would highlight the second sentence because it seems more reasonable
Answer:
C. The sale of cigarettes should be illegal
Explanation:
All the other statements in Denise’s arguments only provide the premise for which the sale of cigarettes is illegal. They only give reasons and evidences to corroborate the fact that the sale of cigarettes is illegal. The use of indicators such as “noting that”, “furthermore”, etc. also explains why the other statements in the argument are premises and not conclusion.
The statement, “The sales of cigarettes should be illegal”, is the only one that identifies the crux of Denise’s argument.
Answer:
Hardin's metaphor describes a lifeboat bearing 50 people, with room for ten more. The lifeboat is in an ocean surrounded by a hundred swimmers. The "ethics" of the situation stem from the dilemma of whether (and under what circumstances) swimmers should be taken aboard the lifeboat.
Hardin compared the lifeboat metaphor to the Spaceship Earth model of resource distribution, which he criticizes by asserting that a spaceship would be directed by a single leader – a captain – which the Earth lacks. Hardin asserts that the spaceship model leads to the tragedy of the commons. In contrast, the lifeboat metaphor presents individual lifeboats as rich nations and the swimmers as poor nations.
Explanation:
Answer:
Question 1) How do the two know each other?
It is basically asking what is their relationship, and that being they have a family relationship a child with the father. The evidence is that on the top of the screen of the phone, it says "Dad" meaning that he/she is talking to their father.
Seeing as you’ve supposedly read this story, I recommend analyzing the text briefly before writing your narrative (mini story from the perspective of Grendel)
Use your imagination to turn Grendel into whatever you want while maintaining facts.
It actually isn’t too difficult. It shouldn’t take long. Let your creativity thrive!
