Answer:
<em>Roosevelt's speech was crafted in order to appeal to her French audience. Roosevelt informed her “free” French audience what it would be like to not live a free life.</em>
Explanation:
Questions and Answers :)
What was the main idea of Eleanor Roosevelt's speech to the United Nations General Assembly?
Her speech, The Struggle for Human Rights, was delivered in September 1948 in Paris, with the aim to encourage U.N. member states to cast votes in support of the document. Roosevelt implored the audience: The future must see the broadening of human rights throughout the world.
What is the struggle for human rights speech about?
In 1958, Roosevelt delivered a speech in Paris entitled “The Struggle for Human Rights,” that aimed to persuade UN member states to vote for the Declaration. ... Roosevelt's rebuttal to these criticisms lays out the fundamental importance of individual liberties and of putting power in the hands of the people.
<h2><u><em>
Good Luck On Your Assignment- Joshua Amachee</em></u></h2>
Answer:
I believe the best answers are:
blank 1 -- C) that has
blank 2 -- A) NO CHANGE
Explanation:
The original sentence, "...the US government has the power to take custody of land when having historical significance or great natural beauty" is a bit ambiguous. Who has historical significance? We assume it is the land. But, in the way it is phrased, it could also be the government. To eliminate such ambiguity, the best option is letter C) that has. It will help determine a certain land can be taken. What land? The one that has historical significance.
As for the sentence, "The designation of a territory as a national park, national monument, or other types of protected area can limit activities," I don't see any reasons for changes. Especially because of the word "other", which needs to be completed by a plural noun - eliminating options B and C. Letter D wouldn't be incorrect, but the transformation of "protected area" into an adjective for "types" is unnecessary. The sentence is perfect the way it is and, therefore, needs NO CHANGE.
What’s wrong? Talk to me :)
Answer:
<h3>For starts, one major cause is family violence this has such a negative impact on children sometimes they are the victims in their own homes. Not from physical hits and slaps but being able to see and hear violence. Many people often speak of this generation that has no respect. Well it was once said, home is where everything begins. Unfortunately, there are parents who have strayed away and lost the true beauty of raising their children. Instead, there is no reverence for children anymore. Video games and other technical gadgets have taken the place of that parent(s) per say. The things that they hear and see conducted by one parent or both such as arguments, fighting, and drug use, alcohol, and poverty in their eyes it is acceptable. Because they do not know the difference there is a growing lack to what parents allow their children to see and hear. Therefore this is what fosters a rising level of violence in a home.</h3>
<h3>There is a definite correlation between domestic violence and child abuse. Growing up in a violent home can set patterns for children … patterns that can cause them to commit violence and abuse, and continue the cycle of violence and abuse.</h3><h3 /><h3>Children living in violent homes are often too frightened and embarrassed to speak out.</h3>
<h3>It’s an experience that a child will not forget. It’s an experience that can affect every aspect of a child’s life, growth and their development.</h3>
