Respect for impartial standards of fairness and equity guides the justice approach to deciding ethical dilemmas.
The justice approach involves deciding ethical dilemmas, respecting imperial standards of fairness, guided by respect for impartial standards of fairness and equity
B. Revelation
The last book in the Bible, Revelation, often subject to wide interpretations. It was written by John, It refers to a vision (other word to Revelation to John) another popular name is the Apocalypse. This book describes the New Order to come, also are references to Great Judgment, afterlife..etc
D.Gospels by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John
The cornerstone of the New Testament, they constitute 4 different approaches to describe and detail the life of Jesus Christ.
E. Epistles, including letters from Paul
A large number of letters sent by Paul to a great amount of audience, often friends, or leaders , as well as primitive churches that became established and were in many cases visited by him as the Gospel began to expand in Middle East, Africa and Mediterranean areas.
G. parables about Jesus’s life and teachings
They can bee seen in many sections of the Bible, parables were told as a primary source for teaching moral principles and images describing the teachings of Jesus Christ as he tried always to simplify and make things accesible to poor and often iliterate masses of people.
The answer is 12
just add me on ps3 il tell you how i did it
Answer:
What can you predict in someone's situation (from your point of view) that made them act a certain way? (read last paragraph for shorter explanation)
-
The Correspondent Inference Theory is a psychological model which is used to explain how people infer (predict) the disposition (characteristics) of another person based on that person’s actions, regardless of what the action achieved or any situational factors. Thus, it is an observer attribution model and not a motivational model. It was first proposed by Edward Jones and Keith Davis in 1966
Explanation:
Overall, the question is asking you to recall a memory of watching or observing someone's behavior to see if their reasons for behaving as such were voluntary or involuntary. For example, a waiter at a restaurant. They are polite to you, take your orders, and serve you, but they have to because their job requires them to. The purpose of the theory was to explain why people make the decisions they do; because they want to, or they have to.
example, there is someone speeding at 70 MPH and the limit is 45. You may assume they are in a hurry, or they just want to speed just because. That is until you make an observation as to why they may be speeding. If you can find an answer to this via experience, you will have a simple answer. Any example of behavior will work, such as people being rude to you, or being nice. What can you predict in their situation from your point of view that made them act like that?
+ The attribution theory's purpose also connects to how people explain the cause of behavior and situations... I.e, is someone angry because they are bad-tempered or because something bad happened ? the whole point in your answer should explain an encounter and know the reason why the other person acted the way they did.
Answer: d) Non- exclusionary time-out
Explanation:
Non-exclusionary time-out is defined as the process in which reinforcers are eliminated from the surrounding for a short time on temporary basis or interaction between the reinforcer and person in not permitted. Presence of the person in reinforced environment is permitted.
According to the question, teacher tending to manipulate reinforcer interaction with students for short while , students being in the same place displays non-exclusionary time out.
Other options are incorrect because exclusionary time-out eliminates presence of child from reinforcing background. Seclusion and non-seclusion time out is based on restraintment. Thus, the correct option is option(d).