1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
3 years ago
14

A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based

on state law, alleging that she was severely burned because the top flew off the pressure cooker during operation. Under the state law, a jury verdict does not have to be unanimous. However, a specific rule under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directly conflicts with the state law and provides that jury verdicts in federal court must be unanimous. Which statement correctly presents what law the federal judge should apply regarding the jury verdict
Law
1 answer:
Scilla [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The federal rule must apply in this case.

Explanation:

A federal court must, in fact, apply to state law when it has a case that was initiated under state law. However, when this case is also based on diversity of citizenship, a federal statute, or a federal rule, as shown in the case above, the court must apply the federal rule, provided that procedural rule does not interfere or deny any right, as shown in the case of the question above. Therefore, the court must apply federal rule.

You might be interested in
Recommende two ways in which women and children can be protected from discrimination and violence​
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Women and children are given defense

Explanation:

some people have alarms on keychains that you can push a button and a loud piercing alarm scares off the attacker and alerts others

8 0
3 years ago
Life as grooming is FANSTATIC :D come on teen lets go parta ;))
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

Explanation:

Loll..

Thnx for the points.

7 0
3 years ago
Are the number of civil lawsuits filed in California trending up or down?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

The number of civil lawsuits filed in California rises up to 6 percent.

Explanation:

The filings in the United States increased 56 percent to 56,987. Prisoner petition filings rises up to 160 percent to 30,079.

To find a pending lawsuit, visit or call the court's clerk office were the cases are filed. There are around 29.7 million civil and criminal cases pending in the country.

It is estimated that over 40 million lawsuits are filed every year in United States.

5 0
3 years ago
How does Henry's statement reflect the idea of social contract? How does the idea of social contract protect people's natural an
marta [7]

Answer:

Basically, what the statement is saying is that the constituents of a government are it's most valuable resource, and nothing is more important than that resource. The social contract is the implicit agreement between the government and the people saying that if the people follow laws and work together for societal benefits, it is the responsibility of the government to protect them. <u>This Reflects the idea of the social contract </u> because the government's most valuable resource is its people, and under the social contract, if they follow laws, it is the government's responsibility to protect them and their rights. <u>As for how the social contract protects people's rights,</u> if the constituents follow laws and contribute towards the development of society, it is the governments responsibility to protect their rights.

4 0
3 years ago
Evidence collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECP
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Exclusionary Rule.

Explanation:

The exclusionary rule is a legal rule of the constitution that prevents any illegal search and seizure of 'evidence' that is collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. It also prevents the presentation of such 'evidence' in a court of law.

This rule also states that any evidence collected in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) may not be admissible in a court of law as legal evidence as it is 'seized' in violation of the person's constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prevents the government from doing any search or seizure of 'evidence' of a person's home without due reasonable reason. Thus, it prevents a person's from being forcefully searched. So, when such searches are done and evidence produced before the court, they are not admissible under the exclusionary rule.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • About one in every ten drivers?
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the difference between civil rights and civil liberties
    7·1 answer
  • What is the most important benefit of having a difficult amendment process
    8·1 answer
  • Because capitalism's primary goal is profit, our economic system, what should our
    13·1 answer
  • Customer service contact number
    14·1 answer
  • 10. According to Peel the mission of the police is to:
    7·1 answer
  • what is justice and provide an example of South African law that you find unjust, and which you would change ​
    8·1 answer
  • How can a mask help you be smart
    13·2 answers
  • isaiah wants to build a new shopping complex. he is afraid that once news gets out about his plans, the price of the land where
    10·1 answer
  • Paragraph #1
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!