All categories

3 years ago

Use the long division method to find the result when 2 x 3 + 7 x 2 + 14 x + 12 2x 3 +7x 2 +14x+12 is divided by 2 x + 3 2x+3

Mathematics

1 answer:

egoroff_w [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

2 x 3 + 7 x 2 + 14 x + 12÷ 2x+ 3 = x² +2x+ 4

Step-by-step explanation:

We multiply the first term 2x of the divisor with a term ( quotient) to get the first term of the dividend. Then we multiply the same term with each term of the divisor and subtract it from the dividend. The process continues unless we get the zero or a much smaller number than the dividend as the remainder

x² +2x+ 4

2x+3 ║2 x 3 + 7 x 2 + 14 x + 12

2x³ + 3x²

- -

4x² +14x+12

4x²+ 6x

- -

8x+12

- -

0

You might be interested in

Rewrite as a simplified fraction. 2.3 = ?

zubka84 [21]

Answer:

23/100 or 23/10

Step-by-step explanation:

2.3/1

(2.3 x 10) / (1 x 10) =23/10

find lcm (lowest common multiple) for 23 and 10

1 is the lcm for 23 and 10

23/10 is a simplest fraction for the decimal point number 2.3

7 0

3 years ago

Mr. Voelz estimates that he will spend $10 on concessions at the basketball game. He actually spends $15. What is the percent er

irina [24]

Answer:

I am not sure but if you divide those 2 numbers such as dividing 10 by 15 you will get 0.666666666667 but if you round it you will have 67%

Step-by-step explanation:

Plz mark Brainliest

5 0

3 years ago

Help me answer these questions please 15, 19 and 20 please

SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

15) K'(t) = 5[5^(t)•In 5] - 2[3^(t)•In 3]

19) P'(w) = 2e^(w) - (1/5)[2^(w)•In 2]

20) Q'(w) = -6w^(-3) - (2/5)w^(-7/5) - ¼w^(-¾)

Step-by-step explanation:

We are to find the derivative of the questions pointed out.

15) K(t) = 5(5^(t)) - 2(3^(t))

Using implicit differentiation, we have;

K'(t) = 5[5^(t)•In 5] - 2[3^(t)•In 3]

19) P(w) = 2e^(w) - (2^(w))/5

P'(w) = 2e^(w) - (1/5)[2^(w)•In 2]

20) Q(W) = 3w^(-2) + w^(-2/5) - w^(¼)

Q'(w) = -6w^(-2 - 1) + (-2/5)w^(-2/5 - 1) - ¼w^(¼ - 1)

Q'(w) = -6w^(-3) - (2/5)w^(-7/5) - ¼w^(-¾)

7 0

3 years ago

Ping lives at the corner of 3rd Street and 6th Avenue. Ari lives at the corner of 21st Street and 18th Avenue. There is a gym Tw

mr_godi [17]

Answer: (15th street, 14th Avenue)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following :

Ping's residence = (3rd street, 6th Avenue)

Ari's residence = (21st street, 18th Avenue)

Gym location = 2/3 the distance of Ping's residence to Ari's residence

So, distance between Ping's home to Ari's home

Distance = (21st street, 18th Avenue) - (3rd street, 6th Avenue)

Distance = (21 - 3) street, (18 - 6) avenue

Distance between ping and Ari = (18th , 12th )

Gym distance = 2/3 of distance between ping and Ari

Gym distance = 2/3 × (18), 2/3 ×(12)

Gym distance = (12, 8)

Gym location = Ping's location + gym distance

Gym location = (3rd street, 6th Avenue) + (12th street, 8th Avenue)

Gym location = (15th street, 14th Avenue)

3 0

3 years ago

Mike and Teegan each measured the volume of the 16-ounce bottle three times. They recorded their measurements as shown. Mike: 16

-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

The correct option is;

Mike's measurement are more precise and more accurate

Step-by-step explanation:

The given information are;

The mass of the measured bottle = 16-ounce

The record of the measurements made by Mike are;

16.4 oz

15.2 oz

15.8 oz

The record of the measurements made by Teegan are;

16.34 oz

16.59 oz

15.13 oz

From the two measurements, we have;

The precision of a measurement depends on how close the values of the measurement are to one another, therefore, we have;

For Mike, the precision is given as follows

16.4 - 15.2 = 1.2

16.4 - 15.8 = 0.6

15.8 - 15.2 = 0.6

Total difference = 1.2 + 0.6 + 0.6 = 2.4

For Teegan , the precision is given as follows

16.59 - 16.34 = 0.25

16.59 - 15.13 = 1.46

16.34 - 15.13 = 1.21

Total difference = 0.25 + 1.46 + 1.21 = 2.92

Therefore, Mike's measurements are more precise than Teegan's measurements

The accuracy of the measurement is the amount of closeness the measurements are to a given value

In the question, the given value is 16-ounces of the volume of the bottle

Therefore, by the mean absolute deviation from the 16-ounce of the bottle, we have;

For Mike;

$Mean \ absolute \ deviation = \dfrac{\left | 16.4 - 16 \right | + \left | 15.2 - 16 \right | + \left | 15.8 - 16 \right | }{3} = 0.533$

For Teegan, we have;

$Mean \ absolute \ deviation = \dfrac{\left | 16.34 - 16 \right | + \left | 16.59 - 16 \right | + \left | 15.13 - 16 \right | }{3} = 0.6$

Therefore, Mike's measurement is more accurate than Teegan's measurement.

Which gives;

Mike's measurement are more precise and more accurate.

9 0

3 years ago