Answer:
5. The answer is 2
6. Her error is that she was supposed to subtract 16 minus 12 instead of 12 minus 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
For number 5 all I did was solve.
12 + (25 - 5^2) - 2 =
12 + 0 - 2 =
12 - 2 = 10
10 ÷ 5 = 2
So, for number 5 the answer is 2.
For number 6, you should know that when there are only plus and minus signs you solve from left to right.
She instead put parentheses where there shouldn't of been, and because of that she is wrong.
Hope this helps! :)
The format of a line equation is y = mx + b
When two lines are parallel, their 'm' variables are equal.
Knowing this, the unknown line equation, so far, would look like this:
y = 9x + b
Since we know that the line equation goes through the point (2, 7)
7 = 18 + b
b = -11
y = 9x - 11
2(-3-7)+5= <span>2(-10)+5= -20 + 5= -15
-15 is your final answer</span>
Answer:
The ratio of female-to-male is 1:2
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 10 female students and 20 male students. If we were to divide each number by 10, we would get 1 and 2, respectively. That means for every 1 female student, there are 2 male students. The ratio would then be 1:2.
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
