It should be the first choice.
Answer:
The statistics show how many people aren't vaccinating their children.
Explanation:
Statistics aren't provided specifically to writers by doctors, they come from whatever reports the writer chooses to use, so that rules out choice 2.
I assume the passage is making a point about how vaccines should be trusted and the anti-vax movement is detrimental, so choice 3 would prove the opposite point.
Statistics are logical, not emotional, so choice 4 is out.
Therefore, choice 1 is the only logical answer.
(I can't be completely sure of this answer without seeing the actual paragraph- I could be wrongly assuming the point that the author is trying to make. If they are trying to prove that vaccines <em>are</em> widely used, then the answer is choice 3. However, that doesn't seem like a very argumentative point to me, so I assumed that they were trying to prove that vaccines need to be used <em>more</em>, making the answer choice 1.)
Answer:
I think that B is best but what ever you think that you can get your point across best is what you should go with
hope this helped Willow
All of the programs are helpful in alleviating poverty because people don't have to pay for them. Nutrition programs give you food form the country just like housing and free healthcare are made to stop you from wasting your own money on it. All of the programs help people spend money on things that they need and are not for basic survival.
