The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think the best contribution that had the biggest impact on history was the idea of freedom to be an independent nation and establish its own rules to govern a country. For me, Liberty is the most important contribution because that idea allowed people to fight for independence as was the case of the United States that had to fight in the Revolutionary War to defeat the British troops and get independence from the English Monarchy. Or what about the French Revolution. Or even the Mexican Independence movement when they got freedom from the Spanish crown.
The United States Congress most often defers to the executive in military and foreign policy matters. Congress tends to do this because the president is the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces. Furthermore, the U.S. president is more likely to have communication with--and relationships--with foreign leaders.
The answer is c) peace of Riga Treaty
Because the working conditions were terrible.
In the days of the Industrial Revolution, the workday was abusive and inhuman, as it ranged from 10, 12 or even 18 hours of work. Which meant that employees simply did not have a life outside the factory environment.
Other than that, in a pre-labor time, in the first factories the working conditions were really unhealthy, especially because of the lack of safety care, accidents were common, with mutilations of people, among other things.
Answer:Machiavelli’s realism
Niccolò Machiavelli, whose work derived from sources as authentically humanistic as those of Ficino, proceeded along a wholly opposite course. A throwback to the chancellor-humanists Salutati, Bruni, and Poggio, he served Florence in a similar capacity and with equal fidelity, using his erudition and eloquence in a civic cause. Like Vittorino and other early humanists, he believed in the centrality of historical studies, and he performed a signally humanistic function by creating, in La mandragola (1518; The Mandrake), the first vernacular imitation of Roman comedy. His unswerving concentration on human weakness and institutional corruption suggests the influence of Boccaccio; and, like Boccaccio, he used these reminders less as topical satire than as practical gauges of human nature. In one way at least, Machiavelli is more humanistic (i.e., closer to the classics) than the other humanists, for while Vittorino and his school ransacked history for examples of virtue, Machiavelli (true to the spirit of Polybius, Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus) embraced all of history—good, evil, and indifferent—as his school of reality. Like Salutati, though perhaps with greater self-awareness, Machiavelli was ambiguous as to the relative merits of republics and monarchies. In both public and private writings—especially the Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (1531; Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy)—he showed a marked preference for republican government, but in The Prince (1532) he developed, with apparent approval, a model of radical autocracy. For this reason, his goals have remained unclear.
Explanation:
