Helppp
2 answers:
Answer:
AHHH IM SO LATE BUT I DID THE PROJECT
HERES MY GRADE SO YALL BELIEVE ME
Anyways here you go (just re-word it)
The argument against school gardens was more persuasive than the other school garden argument. The argument against school gardens was more persuasive because some people see school gardens as taking time away from classroom academics. Research also does not provide any proof that spending time in a school garden can lead to higher graduation rates. For supporters argument it states that “Nearly every research study for the past 100 years has shown that for students to perform well after graduation, schools must teach to the whole child and provide whole-school experiences.” Personally, I don’t think that school gardens will affect students after they graduate. This is how against supporters was more convincible than the other opponents.
thank me later...
You might be interested in