1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eva8 [605]
3 years ago
6

Answer the following question with at least three complete sentences. Be sure to use specific examples from the lessons in your

answer.
Compare and contrast the roles of slaves and freemen in the Roman Republic.
History
1 answer:
hoa [83]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Slaves were abused and treated badly and freemen were not. However, the role of slaves and freemen were very similar in a lot of aspects. They were ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves, then you are born a slave. If your parents are not slaves, you are not born a slave).

You might be interested in
How did the government and the railroads encourage settlement of the west
Natalka [10]
The primary way in which the government encouraged settlement in the west was through the Homestead Act, which gave people free land--while the railroads allowed them to travel there safely. 
5 0
3 years ago
Where is salt mined in the Midwest?
sesenic [268]
Detroit is where in the midwestern they mined for salt.
3 0
3 years ago
Compare urban culture in the gilded age to puritan culture in the colonial era
Soloha48 [4]
<span>The Gilded Age is the latter half of the 19th century, when an increase in production and wealth drove many more people to live in urban areas than had ever before. The middle class gained more wealth and sought to live like the elite upper class. This stands in stark contrast to the lifestyle of Puritans in the 16th and 17th centuries, who sought to live simple and pure lives devoid of wealth. Puritans lived in small settlements and avoided excess wealth.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Winston Churchill's reaction to the 1938 Munich Agreement was...
gayaneshka [121]

When Chamberlain signed the Munich agreement, essentially giving Czechoslovakia to the Germans in an attempt to prevent a war, Churchill opposed the pact both because it was dishonorable he said it brought "shame" to England and because he believed it was only forestalling, not preventing, the war he recognized was inevitable. He thought it would only make the situation worse later to appease Hitler rather than confronting him militarily over Czechoslovakia's Sudetenland.  

<u>Answer is D</u>

3 0
3 years ago
What is Bernoulli's principle?
STatiana [176]

Answer:the principle in hydrodynamics that an increase in the velocity of a stream of fluid results in a decrease in pressure

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which describes one reason for the end of long cattle drives?
    7·2 answers
  • What outcome did davis and lee expect from a confederate invasion of the north m
    14·1 answer
  • what does the untied nations general assembly hope to achieve through the adoption of the universal declaration of human rights
    13·1 answer
  • The european slave trade reoriented african political and economic power structures by _________.
    11·1 answer
  • Explain how the concept of "parity" was designed to solve the farm problem. What happened to parity legislation?
    5·1 answer
  • The Nevada Constitution takes which of the following positions regarding<br> public lands?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Untouchables suffer in the Indian caste system?
    6·1 answer
  • What decision did David make to make just prior to the beginning of the civil war
    14·2 answers
  • What is the message of this cartoon?
    11·1 answer
  • True or false i need help
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!